Psychometric Properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) Among Middle Adolescents in a Collectivist Cultural Setting

Although a growing body of research has examined the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among late adolescent, adult, and older adult populations, there is a dearth of research examining the properties among middle adolescents across countries and cultures. This study therefore examined the psychometric properties—reliability, validity, temporal stability, and gender invariance—of the SWLS among a sample of middle adolescent students attending English-medium schools in the collectivist cultural setting of India. McDonald’s omega coefficient indicated that the SWLS scores showed evidence of reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated the factorial validity of the SWLS scores. Bivariate correlational analyses provided support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the SWLS scores. The results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that the SWLS scores significantly and positively predicted engagement scores and overall school GPA, thereby demonstrating the predictive validity of the SWLS scores. The test–retest reliability coefficient demonstrated the temporal stability of the SWLS scores. The results of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis provided support for gender invariance in the SWLS scores. Taken together, the results show that the SWLS is a psychometrically sound measure appropriate for assessing subjective well-being among middle adolescents enrolled in English-medium schools in a collectivist culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Examining the Psychometric Properties of a Modified Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale: A Rasch Measurement Approach

Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS): Psychometric Properties with a Sample of Polish Adolescents

The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: a preliminary study

Availability of Data and Materials

Upon request authors are prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results.

References

• Antaramian, S. (2017). The importance of very high life satisfaction for students’ academic success. Cogent Education,4, 1307622. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1307622ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,9, 233–255. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• DeShon, R. P. (2004). Measures are not invariant across groups without error variance homogeneity. Psychology Science,46, 137–149. Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology,58, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research,112, 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-yArticleGoogle Scholar
• Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J., & Delgadillo-Chase, D. (2017). If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being,9, 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12090ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Di Fabio, A., & Gori, A. (2016). Measuring adolescent life satisfaction: Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Italian adolescents and young adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,34, 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915621223ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research,99, 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research,26, 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furr, R. M. (2018). Psychometrics: An introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research,90, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Heffner, A. L., & Antaramian, S. P. (2016). The role of life satisfaction in predicting student engagement and achievement. Journal of Happiness Studies,17, 1681–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9665-1ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2019). Compare countries. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/.
• Jiang, X., Lyons, M. D., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). An examination of the reciprocal relations between life satisfaction and social problem solving in early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence,53, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.004ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanović, V. (2016). The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: A preliminary study. Quality of Life Research,25, 3173–3180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jovanović, V., Joshanloo, M., Đunda, D., & Bakhshi, A. (2017). Gender differences in the relationship between domain-specific and general life satisfaction: A study in Iran and Serbia. Applied Research in Quality of Life,12, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9461-zArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kern, M. L., Benson, L., Steinberg, E. A., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being. Psychological Assessment,28, 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000201ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2018). Mplus (Version 8.2) [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. In E. Diener (Ed.), Social indicators research series: Vol. 39. Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 101–117). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent child. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 85–88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research,99, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research,61, 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021326822957ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Silva, A. D., Taveira, M. C., Marques, C., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Satisfaction with Life Scale among adolescents and young adults in Portugal: Extending evidence of construct validity. Social Indicators Research,120, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0587-9ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Wu, C.-H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences,40, 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., & Hutz, C. S. (2014). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale to Brazilians: Evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and US. Social Indicators Research,119, 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0478-5ArticleGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Assessment and School Evaluation Division, Emirates College for Advanced Education, P O Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Shaljan Areepattamannil
2. Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India Samina Bano

1. Shaljan Areepattamannil